Archive
November 2000
Customer Experience Is A Culture Problem
- May 10th, 2016
- Forbes Blog
- 0 Comments
Customer experience has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past four years. Beginning as a new software category promising to help companies delight, convert and retain customers to where it is today, a business discipline, focused on aligning culture, strategy and processes to audiences’ lifecycle expectations. The road has been a bumpy one. The software category matured, fragmented and is consolidating as vendors and users, alike, tried to achieve the promised ROI – revenue growth from customer loyalty. Companies ran into multiple roadblocks mostly from employee fear, resistance to change, lack of internal competences and mistaken belief that software could bypass change management. Vendors, on the other hand, introduced a steady stream of features at a cadence that outpaced the capabilities and understanding of the most sophisticated users. An impasse has been reached. Frustrated users are taking a step back to evaluate why delivering the experience customers valued was so hard. Robert Tas, chief marketing officer of Pegasystems, a strategic applications vendor for marketing, sales, service, and operations, summed up five key barriers as:
- Companies structured around products instead of customers,
- Treating digital experience as a ‘check the box’ and not understanding what it means,
- Line of business-centric funding model that doesn’t benefit anyone else,
- Disconnect between employee expectations with them being treated as consumers and how they ultimately treat customers , and
- Not closing customer feedback loops and being transparent.
- People – empower front-line employees to do what is right to meet customer expectations. Fanous takes a different approach to hiring customer success managers. He hires seasoned practitioners, storage and system administrators, that have scored high on empathy skills. These employees have the maturity and experience to make the right decisions and serve as advisors to customers that add value to every interaction.
- Engineering – is required to ‘man’ the customer support center and answer support calls. Having the employees who design the product address customer complaints, questions and concerns results in better designed products that can be produced with fewer defects. In short, they take more care in doing their job because they are directly accountable to customers.
- Automation – to remove complexity from the user interface of products. Fanous found that the ease of product use directly correlates to repeat purchases and higher NPS scores. Ease of use, however, cannot come at the expense of missing product features, value add or differentiation.
Journey Mapping the Customer Experience
- August 6th, 2015
- CMSWire
- 0 Comments
“‘We’re going to solve the customer experience problem’ is a hard sell to the C-suite,” said Miguel Quiroga, executive director of customer experience at Verizon. He went on to advise the audience at the Clarabridge C3 Conference on how to overcome that resistance. His advice? Identify which experiences matter the most in balancing customer satisfaction with profitability. Fix those experiences that are at the “root of the strongest customer pain points and are linked to the most profit.” Sound advice since the language of the C-suite is profit, revenue and growth. Despite all the rhetoric, the truth is the religion of the customer has not been embraced by the C-Suite as fervently as we’d all like to believe – despite Gartner’s claim that “89 percent of companies surveyed plan to compete primarily on the basis of the customer experience by 2016.” Quiroga’s advice is to pick your battles: Prioritize the experiences to fix; be clear on how to measure improvement; set expectations internally and externally; then scale across the customer lifecycle and the organization. Keep in mind that the last experience the customer has defines his or her expectations going forward.
Understanding Customer Experience
Before you can actually fix any experience, you need to understand it. That's where most companies get stuck – not because the work is hard, but rather because there is a multitude of approaches without a clear consensus, and companies lack the requisite skills. The challenge with most approaches is twofold: They must provide a complete picture of the journey and they must invoke the viewpoint of the customer. Most approaches advocate focusing on a few customer touchpoints, which are often defined from a company’s “inside-out” perspective, not by customers. This approach does not result in significant, profit-impacting improvement because it lacks context. It’s like looking at a handful of puzzle pieces and guessing what the whole picture looks like. The objective of journey mapping is to reduce complexity and make all the aspects of the customers’ experience understandable and accessible to everyone in the organization. The best way to do journey mapping is to interview your customers face-to-face — qualitative research — and document, in detail, their entire experience through their eyes. Start with the trigger event that causes your customers to realize they have a problem or opportunity. Then map their decisions, actions and emotions all the way through purchase and implementation to the point of renewal or retirement. Done correctly by someone experienced in conducting and interpreting the qualitative research, the results will enhance the company’s success far beyond simply highlighting key experiences that need to be addressed. In fact, there are 30 uses for journey maps.Creating the Map
Let’s talk about how to journey map, since that is where companies are getting stuck. One process, as defined in the Sellers’ Compass methodology, includes five steps, which can often be completed in 45 days:Step 1: Data Breadcrumbs
- Identify sample size (industry, region, product) and roles to be interviewed
- Analyze trends
- Conduct internal journey mapping session with cross-functional team
Step 2: Interview Customers
- Conduct 45- to 60-minute interviews with two roles per company
- Transcribe and anonymize interviews
- Complete 15 to 20 interviews per sample
Step 3: Journey Map
- Plot detailed patterns of behavior as well as outliers
- For each journey step define the 5 “W”s
- Define interaction channels, emotion evokers, content and other drivers
Step 4: Tollgating and Content
- List tollgates by step
- Define buyers’ process for passing tollgates
- Define content/channel/source for each tollgate
Step 5: Gap Analysis
- Conduct gap analysis on content, interactions, CTA, channels, etc.
- Define “needle move” action plan and timeline for fast results
Using the Map
According to Jeff Freund, CEO and co-founder of Akoonu, “Your journey maps need to capture four core dimensions at each buying stage for each of your buyer personas: The buyer’s participation level (driver, participant, gate-keeper), the buyer’s informational and internals needs, the buyer’s activities to fulfill those needs, and the buyer’s content preferences.” Koren Stucki, Vice President, CEM Consulting for Clarabridge, believes journey maps “should be a catalyst for change.” Stucki has observed the following common pitfalls of journey mapping:- No clear scope and objective
- Lack of qualitative research
- No executive sponsor
- Engaging the wrong stakeholder
- “Inside-out” design
- Activity treated as a one-and-done
- Failing to make journeys practicable
- Bring VOC (Voice of Consumer) into journey maps
- Bring any recordings (from call centers, etc.) and customer quotes into journeys
- The journey mapping team should be cross-functional
- The same team needs to be involved from journey mapping through building the new experience and measuring the result
- Identify listening posts at key points in the journey
- Obtain input from customers on their current and future states
- Measure journey success based on how customers measure performance
- Refresh journey maps annually
- Build a Center of Excellence (COE) around customer experience